<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google CEO talks about help for newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iwantmyrocky.com/2009/01/07/google-ceo-talks-about-help-for-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iwantmyrocky.com/2009/01/07/google-ceo-talks-about-help-for-newspapers/</link>
	<description>Colorado&#039;s oldest newspaper stopped publishing Feb. 27, 2009, but it didn&#039;t die.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:13:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelley Bruce Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.iwantmyrocky.com/2009/01/07/google-ceo-talks-about-help-for-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley Bruce Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwantmyrocky.com/?p=692#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>I found this part of the interview interesting:
&quot;The good news is we could purchase them. We have the cash. But I don&#039;t think our purchasing a newspaper would solve the business problems. It would help solidify the ownership structure, but it doesn&#039;t solve the underlying problem in the business. Until we can answer that question we&#039;re in this uncomfortable conversation.&quot;

Why doesn&#039;t the Rocky pitch Google to buy? Sure, it&#039;s a long shot but if someone could properly convince Google that the Rocky could be Google&#039;s next great &quot;lab&quot; experiment and give Google the chance to set the standard for the future of newspapers.

Schmidt said, &quot;We have a mechanism that enhances online subscriptions, but part of the reason it doesn&#039;t take off is that the culture of the Internet is that information wants to be free. We&#039;ve tried to get newspapers to have more tightly integrated products with ours.&quot;

Well if paper&#039;s aren&#039;t helping themselves by taking advantage of this, Google buying the Rocky would be a great opportunity to develop a working model and show other paper&#039;s how it&#039;s done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this part of the interview interesting:<br />
&#8220;The good news is we could purchase them. We have the cash. But I don&#8217;t think our purchasing a newspaper would solve the business problems. It would help solidify the ownership structure, but it doesn&#8217;t solve the underlying problem in the business. Until we can answer that question we&#8217;re in this uncomfortable conversation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t the Rocky pitch Google to buy? Sure, it&#8217;s a long shot but if someone could properly convince Google that the Rocky could be Google&#8217;s next great &#8220;lab&#8221; experiment and give Google the chance to set the standard for the future of newspapers.</p>
<p>Schmidt said, &#8220;We have a mechanism that enhances online subscriptions, but part of the reason it doesn&#8217;t take off is that the culture of the Internet is that information wants to be free. We&#8217;ve tried to get newspapers to have more tightly integrated products with ours.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well if paper&#8217;s aren&#8217;t helping themselves by taking advantage of this, Google buying the Rocky would be a great opportunity to develop a working model and show other paper&#8217;s how it&#8217;s done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
